The Pearls, abuse and a false gospel

I’ve been reading over several posts regarding the case of little Lydia Schatz being beaten to death by her parents in the middle of the night.  Her loving, cheerful family, full of all the promises Michael and Debi Pearl make throughout their literature.  For Michael Pearl guarantees happy, obedient children in just two days.  (Blockquotes in italics are from Angry Child, posted at No Greater Joy.)

I could break his anger in two days. He would be too scared to get angry.

Too scared.  Beaten too severely.  For there is no upper limit on the number of spankings given a child.  No “three swift swats and sent to his room until supper.”  Instead, he is beaten until he is without breath to complain.  Beaten until he is utterly dominated.  And if he runs?  You walk through the house laughing at his vain attempts at escape.  And just to drive the point home, you place these “rods” conspicuously about the house and wear one ever about your neck so that the little child may always see and remember.

On the third day he would draw into a quiet shell and obey.

I’ve seen children in that shell.  It is a role many children (and adults) fall into when their lives are governed by fear.  And remember, we’re on day three.  Day three!  Two days of beatings?  Stalkings?  Standing emotionless, pushing the child away, denying affection, denying love?  For they emphasize in another essay: When they do something lovely, then you can love them. How heartwarming is the thought of conditional love?

When an abused child is first placed in protective custody, there is a brief period (usually about a month) known as the “honeymoon.”  The foster parent tends to feel like the child believes he is safe.  The child is actually in a state of shock.  The first stage of grief.  And it results in remarkably compliant children who are too scared to do anything but obey.  Sadly, Lydia did not survive long enough to retreat into a quiet shell.  Her sister Zariah almost didn’t, but thankfully has been released from the hospital.

On the fourth day I would treat him with respect and he would respond in kind. On the fifth day the fear would go away and he would relax because he would have judged that as long as he responds correctly there is nothing to fear. On the sixth day he would like himself better and enjoy his new relationship to authority. On the seventh day I would fellowship with him in some activity that he enjoyed. On the eight day he would love me and would make a commitment to always please me because he valued my approval and fellowship. On the ninth day someone would comment that I had the most cheerful and obedient boy that they had ever seen.

And how many times was that said of the Schatz children?  Different to other cases I have read and discussed here, people are coming out and saying they knew this family.  That they were a loving, caring, Christian family.  That their children were happy and well-behaved.

We’d been to their house a few times for church related functions, and once just Paul and I were there, for dinner. We ate shepherd’s pie, and the children were a delight [emphasis mine]. They showed us how to milk their goats.  The husband also had always taken time to reach out to Paul, who in person is extremely reserved and tends to be overlooked, and so Paul was fond of him as well.  Beauty for Ashes

No one saw it coming.

On the tenth day we would be the best of buddies.

This is what is so insidious about this teaching.  Yes, insidious.  Well meaning, loving parents can be driven to abuse, torture and even murder based on a few anecdotes supported by misapplied and misinterpreted Scripture.  I reflect on the testimony of another Christian woman, one who fortunately did not go quite so far.

And to believe that this doctrine of perfection is practically attainable not only wrung the joy out of this family, extinguishing this Mama’s heart of love and grace for my children, it led to excessive, harsh, unbiblical discipline.  Holy Experience

I do not believe it is insignificant that the child that was murdered and the child that was hospitalized were both adopted, nor that little Sean Paddock was adopted.  Children with a history of abuse will not respond the same to a spanking as a child brought up in an otherwise stable home.  And thinking back on it, working as a family support worker for a foster care agency was when I first encountered the pseudo-Christian sense of “mercy” regarding the orphans of our world.

Most felt called into other ministries, or just couldn’t picture themselves in that role, but the responses of a select few were perhaps more telling than I realized at the time.

We would love to host these children in our home, but cannot until the state will let you discipline them.

Which of course refers to spanking.  Because the state does “let” you discipline a child.  In fact, they require it.  I never saw red flags go off in a caseworker’s eyes so fast as when presented with a family that did not seem to address any misbehavior.  Is the parenting repertoire in these groups really so narrow that discipline is equated with spanking and there is no other acceptable parental response to misbehavior?

Of course, those outside Christianity are quick to pounce on this case.  It is everything they seem to want to believe about Christians.

But I’m going to argue that the continued debating over the line between forcing someone to submit and overt abuse that goes on in this world completely misses the point.  When you define entire classes of people, whether children or women, as existing to submit and suggest that willfulness is an evil brought upon your family by the devil, then abuse is inevitable.  The idea itself is abusive and dehumanizing.  Everything else that follows from it is simply logical.

I’m struck, when reading right wing Christian child-rearing advice, on how much the advice resembles the tactics that wife beaters use against their victims. pandagon.net

But here’s the thing.  This teaching isn’t extremist.  It isn’t fundamentalist.  It isn’t even “right wing.”  All of these terms imply that we are somehow all on the same spectrum, with similar beliefs and a fine little line somewhere that most of us choose not to cross, while others debate about precisely where to draw it.

Michael and Debi Pearl preach a different gospel, one in which sinless perfection is possible in this world.  Without Christ, even, as he shares in the opening chapters of To Train Up a Child where he points out that it is about raising obedient children, not Christian children.  It is from this philosophy, this philosophy of 100% perfection, this perfection that Michael Pearl claims to have been living in for years, that this philosophy is derived.

Not from scripture.

Not from watching Amish men and their mules.

Not from the fact they swatted their children and they presumably turned out alright.

If you apply their perfect teaching to your imperfect children, you will achieve perfection.  No need of redemption.  Only continual conditioning, a methodology I actually find much better placed within the secular behaviorist model.  Read up a little on B.F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism and then read To Train Up a Child.

In effect, the Pearls advocate making the home into an operant conditioning chamber. Not a model of mercy and grace, love and respect.  As Spunky pointed out, they have afforded the rod all the power the Gospel normally gives to Christ:  that of redemption.

More on this case, if you can stomach it:

TulipGirl
Tragedy in a Homeschooling Family
When Parenting Kills
Senseless Deception

Get Free Email Updates!

Join our email list to have weekly updates delivered to your inbox.

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

23
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
DanaMissyAngelaWAngie ARobert Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
relizabeth
Guest
relizabeth

Wow, what an excellent & insightful article. Thanks.

Dana
Guest
Dana

Thank you. It was difficult to write because there was so much I wanted to say, but I was already a little fearful that no one would read it through to the end as it was!

Renae
Guest
Renae

What a lesson for all of us. Yes, I require my children to obey, but at what cost? The loss of my temper has only ever resulted in screaming, but is that excusable? No, not at all. It makes me cringe to even think about it. But we work through it and learn about love and forgiveness together. Yes, we all need that redemption you mention, even mama. Especially mama. And I guess that is partly what is so insidious in this case. The methods that you describe aren’t the result of being out of control. They are calculated and… Read more »

Dana
Guest
Dana

Yes, it is the calculated nature that is troublesome. Calculated and emotionless.

Renae
Guest
Renae

Ugh. My last post title relates to this comment, but it’s just a silly look at my own personality. It seems entirely inappropriate after discussing such a serious topic. Please disregard it. Thank you.

Dana
Guest
Dana

Not a problem. 🙂

Jen R. (emeraldsunshine.org)
Guest
Jen R. (emeraldsunshine.org)

I have two extremely well behaved children and I don’t believe in physical punishment. I don’t understand how people can treat their children (regardless of DNA) like this – it totally escapes me.

Dana
Guest
Dana

I’ve seen children with histories of abuse and difficult behaviors improve dramatically through consistent parenting, with no physical punishment. If it is possible for a ward of the state living in a group home, certainly it is possible for a child who has known nothing but love and (relative) consistency since birth?

April
Guest
April

You know we don’t really think of the horror of the term “whited sepulchre”: a nicely painted building in which a body rots, with all the stench and gore that that entails. This is EXACTLY what the Pearl’s spread. “Presentable” families with “acceptable” children, while rotting and dead inside. It’s horrific to read, I can’t imagine living it.

Dana
Guest
Dana

Good term, April. I remember doing nursery duty at a small church, once. We met in a school, and our nursery was a classroom with a carpet on the floor. We were supposed to keep the babies on the carpet. A mom walked in, laid her infant on the floor and pointed at the edge of the carpet. “No!” she signed and said firmly, then walked out. For 45 minutes, that baby stared at the edge of the carpet and didn’t move. I found it a little disturbing, but didn’t know what I was watching. Now I think I know… Read more »

Robert
Guest
Robert

Excellent commentary. 1 John 4:19 We love Him[b] because He first loved us. Romans 5:8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. 1 Corintians 13:1-13 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 And though I… Read more »

Dana
Guest
Dana

Wonderful verses to remind us of our relationships, Robert! And I agree. The capacity to love, even those that seem unlovable, is more important. It bothers me that they redefined simple words. They define “training” as laying a temptation before a child and switching him for falling for it, then go through the bible pulling out the word “training” as proof the bible teaches this. But I’ve never seen training defined that way anywhere else. They say discipline shouldn’t be necessary if training has occurred correctly. But what is discipline? They define it as a severe switching. I’ve never seen… Read more »

Robert
Guest
Robert

“It bothers me that they redefined simple words. They define “training” as laying a temptation before a child and switching him for falling for it, then go through the bible pulling out the word “training” as proof the bible teaches this.” Ephesians 6:4 And, you fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. I don’t know about young women… but I know from first hand experience that a childhood characterized by “training” as define above with a heavy dose of corporal punishment will produce a young man consumed with… Read more »

Robert
Guest
Robert

For emphasis…

Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment; because as He is, so are we in this world. 18 THERE IS NO FEAR IN LOVE; BUT PERFECT LOVE CASTS OUT FEAR, BECAUSE FEAR INVOLVES TORMENT. BUT HE WHO FEARS HAS NOT BEEN MADE PERFECT IN LOVE. 19 We love Him[b] because He first loved us.

Blessings and warm regards,
Robert

Robert
Guest
Robert

Sorry one more quick note…

I do not want to suggest that there are not ANY situations where corporal punishment of some fashion does not have a just application.

I do mean to suggest that it absolutley should not be used with such supremacy, frequency, or severity that your child genuinely fears you.

I also mean to suggest that I would much rather be seen as someone erring from time to time on the side “love is kind” than on the side of “not sparring the rod” at every convenience.

Love is patient.

Robert

Dana
Guest
Dana

Love is patient. There is a scene in one of their writings…I believe it is To Train Up a Child, but maybe not…where a young child (maybe 3?) is playing with a doll. She flips it over and spanks it severely before displaying any affection. I was horrified that the spanking is such a part of this child’s life that she doesn’t know how to interact with a doll without it. My children tickle their dolls toes, gobble their tummies, cuddle them, nurse them and tell them they love them “oh so much.” The Pearls used it as a glowing… Read more »

AngelaW
Guest
AngelaW

My youngest daughter sometimes stomped on her baby dolls as “punishment.” This is in no way something that happened in our home. She rarely got spanked because at that age (2) she believed everything we said was the absolute truth. If I said “It’s time for bed” her routine had been established as far back as she could remember- she would put away her things she was playing with, get her bear she slept with and her blankie and get on her bed, waiting patiently for me and her Dad to come read her a story and say prayers before… Read more »

Dana
Guest
Dana

Just to be clear, I was not trying to say that children cannot come up with bad ideas all on their own, nor that every interaction with a doll indicates how they are treated at home.

It was just an example from the book that the Pearls found to be exemplary while I found it a little disconcerting.

But that is something else. The Pearls don’t really believe we are born with a sin nature, per se. They talk about imputed sin, and the ability to attain sinless perfection in this world.

Angie A
Guest
Angie A

What a shame! I read a book on submission for a wife from Debbie Pearl and I sorry to say I am not surprised at the distortions for parenting as well. When I read the part of a woman going “mad” or crazy because of not submitting to her husband and the Debbie’s response to it, something like: “God sometimes does things like that…” (Sorry do not know exact quote) I freaked. When I showed it to my husband he told me that he wanted me to not read ANYMORE of that book. The distortion and twisting definitely made us… Read more »

Dana
Guest
Dana

Yeah, I read a little of it and it seemed “out there” as well. Don’t know what happened with the links. They are all working for me. Maybe it was just a temporary glitch. I know a couple of the sites are getting a rather high volume of traffic, and that can bring a site down for awhile.

Missy
Guest
Missy

Interestingly, both of these articles showed up on my Facebook home page today. I thought I would pass this on to you… I hope it helps clear up some of the confusion :0)

Editing this comment because it contains a lengthy article copied from another site. It is unclear whether permission to copy has been granted, but the article may be read here:

[squidoo (dot) com/Pearls_2Train_Up_A_Child

Dana
Guest
Dana

Of course the couple are fully responsible for their actions. Nowhere in this entry have I said they are not responsible, nor advocated they get lighter sentences because of the influence of another ministry. I have read the materials I discussed, including TTUAC. And yes, there are indications here and there about abuse. I do not deny that. In fact, I point them out in other entries where I discuss the Pearls. But that does not mean that we turn a blind eye to the influence of this ministry, nor that all is right with it. What is frightening is… Read more »

trackback
Jevlir Caravansary

Christian Carnival CCCXVII…

christian carnival ii archives | submit post Welcome to the March 3, 2010 edition of the Christian Carnival, CCCXVII (317 for the Roman numeral challenged).  I would like to remind everyone that the Christian Carnival is weekly, and that posts must be …